St. Louis County Prosecutor Bob McCullough in SEIUs Pocket!

Recall the summer of 2009?  Traditional values-loving Americans, all over the country were so shocked by the bailouts, cap and trade and other big government expansion programs that they took to the streets in numbers never seen before.  Liberals were shocked that the political right had figured out the playbook of the political left.  As the Congressional Summer recess got underway, leftist politicians found their town hall meetings packed to the rafters with angry people asking tough questions.  As the bloggers streamed the footage and America got a nearly daily dose of another Democrat politician getting hammered, it became clear that the left was unprepared.

Protesters were disparaged as “tea baggers” and Astroturf, but name-calling is not what they do in Chicago.  It might be over the top to say the President himself ordered the hit, but what about his people?  What he said of the conservative protestors is “If they are going to hit us, we will hit them back twice as hard “.  Within two days, a black man distributing patriotic flags and buttons, found himself struggling under a tremendous beating from as many as four separate assailants.  The Service Employees International Union members got the President’s message.  The SEIU members sporting their purple people beater shirts picked their first victim.  Perhaps most disturbing, the attack began with a black union member coming unglued on a black man who did not share his leftist political beliefs all the while calling him a “nigger”. Is this a hate crime?

It has been three months now, so what happened to the thugs?  Nothing.  Local Prosecutors appear to have taken a pass.  The St. Louis County Prosecutor is Bob McCullough.  The police report details a gang-style assault, resisting arrest, the arrest of a journalist for the major daily, the Post-Dispatch and the Prosecutor is claiming something between ignorance and lack of jurisdiction in the case.  So who has jurisdiction for such crimes?

In St. Louis County, an area holding the curious distinction of 92 separate municipalities within the boundaries, municipal prosecutors handle the traffic tickets, ordinance violations, and other minor offenses.  If the crime is committed in the County, but outside of any municipal boundaries, then police will usually hand the job to the County Counselor to be sure justice is done rather than hand it off to the County Prosecutor.  It appears that Prosecutor McCullough believes County Counselor Patricia Reddington should be handling the case.  One can wonder whether the police tried to give it to McCullough or if they took it directly to Reddington.  In any case, those who gang assaulted Ken Gladney walk the streets.  Why? 


Obama’s EPA Puts Gag Order On Cap and Trade Video

Railing against “Cap and Trade” Laurie Williams and Allan Zabel,  attorneys for the EPA, made a video on their own dime with their own  time revealing the truth about trading carbon credits for emissions above cap levels.  Apparently the big guy in the short pants, Obama, did not approve of their efforts, and had Lisa P. Jackson, the big wig of the EPA,  put a gag order on the video, which was posted on you tube.  Being that the creators of the video acknowledge that the video is not a representation of the views of the EPA or the Obama administration the gag order smacks of censorship. For a guy that claims that he was going to bring transparency to the White House, Obama sure has been sweeping a lot of dirt under the carpet lately.

Truth about Kyoto: huge profits, little carbon saved

On the eve of a G8 summit focused on climate change, Nick Davies reveals major flaws in the global system designed to reduce emissions

Cap-and-Trade’s Unlikely Critics: Its Creators

Economists Behind Original Concept Question the System’s Large-Scale Usefulness, and Recommend Emissions Taxes Instead


The lawsuit is an “Interpleader” that shifts the burden of proof to OBAMA Further, OBAMA is named as “BARRY SOETORO” as that is his “real” name when he was legally adopted in Indonesia

01/02/09: The latest in the Berg vs. Obama Case No. 08 – 570 is that there are two conferences scheduled; one for January 9, 2009 to hear the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and the other for January 16, 2009 to hear the Petition for Injunction.



(Washington, D.C. – 12/08/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States today filed with the U.S. Supreme Court an Application for an Injunction to Stay the Electoral Votes on December 15, 2008 and prohibit V.P. Richard B. Cheney, the House of Representatives and the Senate counting any votes for Obama until Obama Proves his is “Qualified” to be President.

Berg filed this while waiting to hear if the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the Writ of Certiorari that he filed on October 30, 2008, requesting review of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s Dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., the DNC and the other co-Defendants regarding “standing.”

Mr. Berg remarked today, “I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Berg continued , “Obama knows he is not ‘natural born’ as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; Obama is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; Obama knows his candidacy is the largest ‘hoax’ attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; Obama places our Constitution in a ‘crisis’ situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world who know Obama is not qualified.”

Fox Toledo News airs Berg v. Obama story




Full Page Ad in Washington Times Weekly

November 17, 2008


Three Unanswered Questions:


Was Barack Obama Born in Kenya?

Is He Really a Citizen of Indonesia?

Does the Constitution still Matter?


Electors are sworn to uphold it with their vote on December 15th in the Electoral College. But they must first know for sure that the candidates meet the Constitutional requirements for the office of President beginning with being a natural born citizen.


That’s what Philip J. Berg has asked the United States Supreme Court to verify. The Supreme Court has asked for a response from Senator Barack Obama along with the Democratic National Committee and Federal Elections Commission. And they have until December 1st to respond. Other cases have been filed asking for the same thing.


Not extreme. Not fringe.

Just Constitutional.


Obama says he’s qualified. But, Berg, multiple legal suits and a growing number of American citizens are saying: “Prove it.” A basic, vital and Constitutional request.


Why won’t Obama answer such a simple and essential request?


Exhibit A: The Grandmother’s tape


Barack Obama’s own grandmother said he was born in Kenya. While politicians are known for it, grandmothers seldom lie. It’s recorded on tape:


“I was in the delivery room in [Mombosa,] Kenya, when he was born Aug. 4, 1961.” – Sarah Obama, Obama’s paternal grandmother


Exhibit B: No Original Birth Certificate


Experts have called the Certification of Live Birth posted online a forgery. Berg reported “It’s clearly been altered,” which invalidates it, according to the document itself. Add to this the Hawaiian law at the time which allowed people to register for this non-hospital short form certificate (without a doctor’s signature) up to one year from the date of the child’s birth.


Exhibit C: Indonesian citizenship


Only Indonesian citizens could attend Indonesian schools at the time Barack Obama attended the Indonesian school where he was registered as Barry Soetoro. His citizenship was listed as Indonesian, his religion as Islam, and his

father as Lolo Soetoro, M.A. There was also no dual citizenship at the time. If he was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather, he would have forfeited any U.S. citizenship he may have had, just as when a child is adopted in America, he or she becomes an American.


Exhibit D: U.S. Law


In addition, according to U.S. law pertaining to births broad, from “Dec. 24, 1952, to Nov. 13, 1986,” in order to register he child’s birth as a U.S. natural-born citizen at the time of Obama’s birth, he or she must be: 1. Born to two U.S. citizen parents; OR 2. If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of the birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least 10 years, at least five of which must be after the age of 14. Since Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 at the time of his birth, she failed to meet the legal require-ments of U.S. residency for at least five years after the age of 14. Either the Constitution matters or it doesn’t. If we are willing to ignore the constitutional requirements for the highest office in our land, what else are we willing to forgo? That part about free speech? Freedom of the press? Freedom of religion?


1. Sign the form below and send it in or sign the petition on the website


2. Call your Congressional Representative at: 202-224-3121. Ask them to verify that the Constitutional requirements have been met and request them to conduct Congressional hearings immediately.


3. Pray for all of the hidden things to come to light and call on the media to report this Constitutional crisis.


4. Donate to help defend our Constitution:


Philip J. Berg, Esq., 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12, Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531


The United States Constitution Article II, Section 1 includes these words:


“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”





Obama Crimes Ad – Wash Times 20081117.pdf

This ad ran on page 5 of the November 17th, 2008 edition of the Washington Times National Weekly

Dr. Ron Polarik on the authenticity of Obama’s COLB




Globe Magazine has an article in the December 8, 2008 edition that provides details about Larry Sinclair and his new book “Obama & Larry Sinclair: Coke, Sex, Lies & Murder?”


Obama remained cool headed during his historic run for the White House shrugging off every nasty attack. But sources close to Obama now say he is incensed by the book and labels it as a “vicious and hurtful attempt to taint” the incoming president.


“Barack Obama is absolutely livid about this book,” reveals a Beltway insider. “He says its all a bunch of crap and he wants it to go away.


“This inauguration is not only important to the nation, it’s important to the entire world,” noted the insider. “We don’t want to see Larry Sinclair’s outrageous words take away from that one bit.”


“…sources say Obama’s wife Michelle is equally upset by the


Now people close to the President-elect declare “it’s time for Sinclair to stop making his lurid allegations and forget about writing a book.” “Enough is enough,” blasts the insider. “Our country is in trouble right now and we don’t need this nonsense.” But Sinclair says he has no plans to scrap his book.




Barack Obama and the Obama team do not want word of my upcoming book to get out. Or is that Obama and the Obama team do not want the TRUTH about him revealed? I say it is the latter.


I believe the world that Barack Obama says is so in love with him, should know exactly what this man is about, how he and his associates manipulated the world media into giving him a free pass and suppressing this story and the attacks his organization leveled against me.


This book will give in-depth detail of every aspect of this encounter from the Chicago 1999 trip to current date.

Sorry Barack, but this book is going to come out, and I will make sure it is center stage in DC for the some 4 million you plan on busing in to witness you taking your “Throne.”

Past Controversies Hang Over Obama’s Cabinet Picks

Cabinet picks could produce bloody confirmation hearings

Saturday, November 22, 2008

As President-elect Barack Obama quickly selects officials for his administration, attention is starting to turn to the potential obstacles they face in Senate confirmation hearings.

The Associated Press, citing a Democratic source, reports that John Podesta, a leader of Obama’s transition team, had told Senate aides on Friday that Obama hoped for a speedy confirmation so the new administration could get to work quickly thereafter.

But past controversies involving some of his picks could make for bloody hearings.

The latest list of Obama’s expected Cabinet selections includes Hillary Clinton for secretary of state, Timothy Geithner as his Treasury secretary, Eric Holder as his attorney general, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson for commerce secretary and Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano for secretary of the Homeland Security Department.

Senators will have to decide in the confirmation hearings whether to broach Richardson’s involvement, though marginal, in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, as well as Napolitano’s work in the Anita Hill sexual harassment case and Holder’s support of President Clinton’s controversial pardon of Marc Rich.

Although none of these nominations is expected to fail, it is possible some could be delayed.

Richardson‘s nomination could be haunted by two incidents. 

First, he offered Lewinsky a job at the United Nations in what prosecutors called an attempt to buy her silence on behalf of President Bill Clinton, according to FOX News’ Washington Deputy Managing Editor Bill Sammon’s book, “Meet the Next President.”

Richardson also could face a Capitol grilling for accusations he faced from both Democratic and Republican senators for failing to properly safeguard nuclear secrets after he left his U.N. post to become energy secretary.

After delaying Richardson’s appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee in 2000 for inquiries into security lapses at Los Alamos National Laboratories, Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia told him he would never again receive Senate support for any office he sought.

“You have squandered your treasure,” Byrd told him.

And though Napolitano, who was re-elected Arizona’s governor in 2006, has spent all of her political career in that state, she is no stranger to Washington controversy.

As a private attorney in Phoenix in 1991, Napolitano was part of the legal team representing Anita Hill, a former Equal Employment Opportunity Commission colleague of Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, whom Hill had accused of sexual harassment. Her work on that case postponed Napolitano’s own Senate confirmation as U.S. attorney but did not derail Thomas’ confirmation as a Supreme Court justice.

At the time, some Republicans suggested she coached a witness for Hill into changing testimony. Napolitano refused to answer questions about that on grounds it would violate the lawyer-client confidentiality agreement.

She was the Clinton-appointed U.S. attorney for Arizona when the Justice Department decided against prosecuting Sen. John McCain’s wife, Cindy, for stealing prescription drugs from her medical charity, but she took no part in that case because she was awaiting Senate confirmation, on which McCain was to vote.

The biggest obstacle facing Obama’s choice for attorney general, Eric Holder, could be his pardon of Marc Rich during the Clinton administration.

Rich was the fugitive billionaire who was given a pardon by Clinton on his final day in office. Rich’s estranged wife, Denise Rich, was a high-paying donor to Clinton.

Senate Republicans have told Obama aides that the Rich pardon would come up during hearings but that the nomination likely wouldn’t be held up, according to a person involved in the talks.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.