Let the scrutinizing begin! It seems that the anti-right has been on an eight year tirade, invoked solely to slander and destroy the former president. Well now the official scrutiny of the Democratic Messiah can begin. No longer can he hide behind his words, now it is time for Barrack Hussein Obama to put up or shut up! Now is the time for Americans of any political affiliation to adopt the principles of those who live in the state of Missouri, that’s right Mr. President, “Show Me, Don’t Tell Me!”


Over the last several years, we have learned that it is more than acceptable to criticize our leader for even the slightest gaff or mispronunciation. I would certainly encourage anyone with the smarts to make a “chimpomatic” for Barak, just as Google had done for GWB. The chimpomatic, for those of you not in the know, was a computer generated program that Google allowed people to attach to their IGoogle page, and it unendingly displayed GWB’s gaffs.  Hmmm! I wonder if that would be politically correct. I’m sure the former head of the NAACP, the great Rev. Joseph Lowery, would frown upon the association of Obama and a chimp-omatic while he still exercises his rights to free speech with the likes of  his racial comment, “white would embrace the right,” during Obama’s divinization, i mean benediction, while being inaugurated. Nonetheless, his having to repeat his oath of office because he duffed it at the inauguration, would be a good place to start on an Obama chimpomatic.


Speaking of the inauguration, and returning to my original gibe at the new “POTUS ignoramus,” is it an omen of his presidency that he is already asking for a redo? I can’t speak for everyone, but it certainly appears that way in my eyes. I mean how big of a dumb ass do you have to be to fail to repeat the words that are spoken in front of you? Makes me wonder if he is truly married to Michelle, after all he did have to repeat some words there too. I guess he and the other great Reverend in his life, Reverend Wright, probably spoke some of the same Chicago style ebonics. Furthermore, I just like to state for clarification, when I say “ignoramus” I don’t mean it in the sense that G. Ruggle portrayed it in his play, “Ignoramus.”  No! No! No! I mean it in its original sense, ya know lawyerly like; rather than go on confusing you, I believe I shall just borrow the definition from Along with the contemporary form of usage, here are the others listed at their website:


[From New Latin ignōrāmus, a grand jury’s endorsement upon a bill of indictment when evidence is deemed insufficient to send the case to a trial jury, from Latin, we do not know, first person pl. present tense of ignōrāre, to be ignorant; see ignore.]


1577, Anglo-Fr. legal term, from L. ignoramus “we do not know,” first person present indicative of ignorare “not to know” (see ignorant). The legal term was one a grand jury could write on a bill when it considered the prosecution’s evidence insufficient. Sense of “ignorant person” came from the title role of George Ruggle’s 1615 play satirizing the ignorance of common lawyers.


(Law) We are ignorant; we ignore; — being the word formerly written on a bill of indictment by a grand jury when there was not sufficient evidence to warrant them in finding it a true bill. The phrase now used is, “No bill,” “No true bill,” or “Not found,” though in some jurisdictions “Ignored” is still used. –Wharton (Law Dict. ).


Even I am ferhoodled when I refer to Obama as, POTUS ignoramus,” after consulting the origins of the word, I find that there are actually three interpretations that are befitting. I’m certain someone else will find a different spin. Feel free to let me know.


Anyways, of the three, I must admit I like the reference to the Latin meaning, “we do not know,” the most. Simply stated, the man is like Wonder Woman, except he is a man . . . at least I think, as time will prove if he actually has any balls . . . or if he’ll straddle the fence for his entire presidency; anyway, I digress, but I know I’m in a state of wonderment about him, the guy hasn’t disclosed squat about himself, yet he holds the highest office in the land; therefore “we do not know.”


Moving on to the lawyerly analysis we can assert two separate meanings; although they are sort of entwined. First let us take a peek at the part of the definition that states, “we ignore; — being the word formerly written on a bill of indictment by a grand jury when there was not sufficient evidence to warrant them in finding it a true bill.”  Yea, I understand we are not exactly dealing with finances, however, the supreme court, when petitioned, failed to provide “sufficient evidence” that Obama is, in fact, a natural born citizen, so I’m going to go ahead and call it like a lot of people see it. Until there is some form of factual proof, I’m going to treat him as an Ignoramus, and do like the Wharton Law dictionary does, that’s right, I’m going to IGNORE his pseudo-presidency.


Lastly, and although partially associated with the aforementioned ideology, I’m going to incite the “no true bill” definition. However I must admit I see it slightly different; I see the empty suit as a “bill of goods.” In one hue, I view him as a guy who is not legitimately the president as he failed to produce valid documentation proving his status as a natural born citizen; hence, he sold us a ”bill of goods,” which is no true bill. Tinted in a slightly different shade, the same assertation can be depicted to illuminate the fact that he ran off at the mouth with a million and one promises of what he is going to do for the lower and middle class people, when those of us who have even the slightest clue know that he sold us a “bill of goods,” or no good bill, if you will! Nonetheless, I’ll be amazed if he honors ten percent of all his campaign promises. And for those who will argue the point thatr the economy is failing and he can’t honor his promises, keep in mind that the economy crashed in September, yet he still peddled his wares after the fact to keep the votes rolling his way.  Feel free to apply whichever version that suits your needs, but understand that twas I who dubbed him POTUS ignoramus.”


Getting over the natural born citizen thing is not an impossible feat; that depends on how he handles his administration. However, what is enraging is the precedent that his disrespect for the electoral process has brought about; and that is not so forgivable. If there aren’t some serious checks implement-ed in time for the next presidential election, there will undoubtedly be some serious implications.


Obama has a long row to hoe. It was his decision to throw his hat into the ring at such an early stage in life, even when he said he wouldn’t because of his lack of experience; the consequence is that now he will have to reap what he has sown. Experience dictates that things that are forced, things that are not meant to be, usually end up in chaos, and you can fully expect that is what will happen. One of life’s little lessons is that respect must be earned; you cannot just take it, as the end result is resentment. Old Tom Cochran may have sung about life being a highway, but it sure as hell isn’t the Chisholm Trail, and the majority of us can’t be prodded along like cattle by the whimsy of a politician.


One can expect that there are going to be a lot of cloudy days in the no so distant future; the POTUS ignoramus,” will certainly reap what he has sown. Undoubtedly, greatness can be projected, but talking about it and achieving it are two different things. The biblical logic of not worshipping false idols is actually a two way street, first and foremost, if one holds to much praise for someone else, they tend to not value their own potential, as they view themselves as not worthy. On the other hand, from the idols perspective, I think I’ll borrow a phrase from the Kansas song Carry On My Wayward Son;” the phrase being, if I claim to be a Wiseman, it surely means that I don’t know.”


I don’t claim to be a wise man, however I do know that people like to destroy their idols, and even more so do they like to decimate those who are self-proclaimed to be special. If I may spout one more quip, I’d just like to say “be careful what you wish for, you just might get it!”


Feel free to tune in for more witticism and banter, as I’ll be here all week, err … for the next four years, same Bat station, same Bat channel . . . “Its Official, the Obama Bashing Has begun . . . again!”


Like Rodney Dangerfield our flag gets no respect

No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America; the flag should not be dipped to any person or thing. Only regimental colors, state flags, and organization or institutional flags are to be dipped as a mark of honor.



Pursuant to TITLE 4 > CHAPTER 1 > § 8 (G) The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.




The lawsuit is an “Interpleader” that shifts the burden of proof to OBAMA Further, OBAMA is named as “BARRY SOETORO” as that is his “real” name when he was legally adopted in Indonesia

01/02/09: The latest in the Berg vs. Obama Case No. 08 – 570 is that there are two conferences scheduled; one for January 9, 2009 to hear the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and the other for January 16, 2009 to hear the Petition for Injunction.



(Washington, D.C. – 12/08/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States today filed with the U.S. Supreme Court an Application for an Injunction to Stay the Electoral Votes on December 15, 2008 and prohibit V.P. Richard B. Cheney, the House of Representatives and the Senate counting any votes for Obama until Obama Proves his is “Qualified” to be President.

Berg filed this while waiting to hear if the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the Writ of Certiorari that he filed on October 30, 2008, requesting review of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s Dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., the DNC and the other co-Defendants regarding “standing.”

Mr. Berg remarked today, “I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Berg continued , “Obama knows he is not ‘natural born’ as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; Obama is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; Obama knows his candidacy is the largest ‘hoax’ attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; Obama places our Constitution in a ‘crisis’ situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world who know Obama is not qualified.”